I’m not a lawyer, I am not an advocate of law and this is not legal advice so do not be advised by any of this or act upon it. In fact, maybe just skip to the next article if you are not sure.
I hope this serves as an admonition of non-admonition to the reader. And I hope it pleases those who are paid to turn simple words into time served in a cell so that a single authoritarian view remains. It’s just my private thoughts for consideration.
This is a prod in the brain for all those that consider themselves British and free in this land and also feel that they are above the constraints of prejudice regarding colour, race, religion or class. In truth, you are not. Even assuming this is the key reason your rights have been taken away allowing ‘assumptions’ to become your law.
In many ways, this is an invitation for us to seek a deeper understanding of three things: law, religion, and science but the intricate details are a whole other story so we will simplify it if it is possible. Maybe an example is needed.
In the world that religion recognised before it became a swear word, there was a duty for people to believe in the unseen. Of course, today that sounds like looking out for a bearded man descending from heaven on a horse while striking people down for violating the Sabbath. But if you can bridge your mind for a second and put all prejudice aside you will actually see that seeing the unseen is referring to mentalism-–a validated science.
Our reality actually does all begin with the thought then the expression of the spoken word to form the material world. Today, for us, that word is Brexit. And out of NOTHING came all of this.
Let’s take two other words: ‘Brexit’ and ‘Law’. Briefly dissect them and illustrate how doltish a clever nation has become. In fact, blaming immigrants for the state of the country is somewhat like a bumpkin calling a pumpkin stupid or is it the other way around? It’s only one’s ego that allows the parading of a birth certificate and academic degrees (a few out of 360) to make them feel more entitled than others born abroad especially when they’re not even sure of which law they are governed by. On a basic level, it’s Maritime and that flag, the Union Jack, is and has always been the flag for ships on high seas. But why didn’t you know that? Once again you’ve assumed wrong by outsourcing your reasoning to the trusted authorities.
Basically, Brexit was really just a slang word, one that a rapper could have invented, although it was actually coined by Peter Wilding to refer to Britain’s possible exit from the EU. So basically the law that governs you, that claims to be the advocate of the highest justice–God, is so flimsy today that a word that didn’t exist a few years ago can today slip into your life and determine you and your progeny’s future existence–basically it wasn’t in God’s laws. For atheists just go with the word God for a moment, if nothing else, it may create an argument to save your freedom. But this only means the original laws that kept us from killing each other.
This condition was never supposed to be put upon people, especially without the consent of the masses. By consent, I mean an independent vote that is clearly and evidently respected and adhered to without mischief.
But what if the word was not ‘Brexit’ but ‘Blingit, would we have been as ready to digest it? Maybe we would have been woken up, from the whimsical spells of this dreamy reality where fictions become law by the stroke of a pen and the nonactions of a narcoleptic nation? And that pen happens to be in the hands of the Oxford dictionary.
The Oxford Dictionary, or agents for their corporate office, officialised the word Brexit in 2016, thus making it a friend of your consolidated word processors. Interesting, the much older word that I love ‘Empath‘ (me) remains a work of fiction and can’t seem to get a look in.
So the country is changing and all because of this new word ‘Brexit’ officially entering your dictionary thus your reality that is also transforming with a little understood word called ‘consent’. The word ‘consent’ is responsible for a lot more than you could imagine, as you will see, especially shown in the video at the end of the article.
What are those?
You could have a thousand people quoting what they think rights are but each one will have a different idea. Let’s imagine you’re travelling from France on a French passport and you settle into this lovely little city called London. You like it and wish to contribute to the lovely way of life, you get stopped by the police, (lower case ‘p’) what do you do?
You give them up. Everything, name, papers, keys, money, information, while they empty your pockets on an assumption because you believe that they can. You feel fortunate to even be allowed into the country let alone resist the bullying of authority the media and the sheople (see Meghan Markle).
Now, let me say this one thing that I hope will stay with you forever. Understand this if nothing else: The route of the word authority is ‘author’. We at UDL are authors and YOU are too: the author of your own affairs and your own destiny unless you have wrongly and deliberately been encumbered or encumbered somebody else’s affairs and destiny; as does the officer that assumes that you have no right to resist this unnecessary pause in your life. Only then should one be taken into custody and the custodian seek remuneration for being stalled in their pursuit of life. This is the simple principle of all law and outweighs all statutes codes and ‘assumptions’. Unless of course, it’s a different type of law. If you can just comprehend this you will immediately become free and equal to the next free person but you won’t; mainly because a lifetime of watching television playing out the model society creates your place and a fixation on fitting in. Unfortunately, this has a crippling effect on what you feel freedom is. The result is someone in servitude to many assumptions.
So, if the worthy human (immigrants or residents) in the Grenfell tower inferno had been given a level of entitlement, the fire may have been circumvented. Unfortunately, this model of unworthiness is the ongoing story of people following a script that has no bearing or standing. It’s an assumption that the public has, the police have and of course, the people at the dole office. The ones that feel you should beg for your keep as though they actually issue the benefit out from their own sphincter each time you are paid.
The housing representatives are no better when a tenant has a concern for their safety it is the housing establishments duty by law to address it immediately, but they won’t and you, because of the reasons above will capitulate–again, you think yourself lucky to have a roof over your head. Not to turn the homeless situation on its head but a roof is an actual human right.
Human rights is a funny old thing because most have forgotten what it means to do what the heck they please. Evidence of this amnesia is the seatbelt law, which by the way is a statute of positive law. The root word ‘posit’ which means ‘a statement which is made on the assumption that it will prove to be true‘. again, ‘assumed’. Who is injured when you decide to leave your seatbelt off? In real LAW, which are bi-laws from original ecclesiastic laws pertaining to those seeking peaceful living on God’s earth, if they do not reflect this quest for harmony for everybody in an equitable way they are not law. Unless we are working with a different law. I will guess that you know it’s about commerce.
In the movie Minority Report, 2002, Tom Cruise played John Anderton, a Policeman that basically arrests people for possible future crimes. The philosophy of this science fiction has quietly been carried into our society and created such corruption that it has abused its authority placing children in jail because of silly statutes like Joint Enterprise or now Common Purpose, which I refuse to understand because it is not law. Notice that, for those that have seen the movie, it was only when the officer was also accused of a future crime that his ego reclined and finally allowed him to see that he was not above the law and just like everybody else.
But why couldn’t he question the morality of his job until it affected him, he was definitely not an empath? In such stark expression of organised injustice by establishments the person carrying out the job must feel detached, therefore a separation between the people and the police must also be enforced. Love your police and teach them. They are not yet androids, although you can hold your breath for that. If any police persons are reading this do remember that you should first question the morality of what you enforce otherwise you are nothing but a bouncer–the brains are just biceps responding without thought.
So please comprehend the extent of your rights and realise that you, as undeserving as you feel, have been given dominion over the green, brown and blue and whatever means in which you must act so that the earth serves you best. If you’re not stepping on other’s toes, it’s your God-given right. And, if anybody, uniformed or otherwise, accosts you on your merry way, if you are not a commonly known criminal, they are in the way of your freedom to move. If you can just understand that, your world will change and this kind of assumption that badge yielding humans have, allowing them to break the divine’s law will cease to have any power at all.
It’s never been more important to wake up. Don’t be John Anderton, don’t let the press tell you who to blame or you may end up like this fool.
Be like a child with love and intuition at you’re capable of constructive reasoning like an eleven-year-old, like Greta Thunberg, act, learn love for humanity, learn the earth’s law, not assumptions and corporate codes. Become familiar with the old Maxim of Law: ‘Let him who wishes to be deceived, be deceived’. There’s no protection for fools–by law.